Let’s talk

R&D OPERATIONS

When R&D Operations Outgrow Spreadsheets

A practical framework for connected work

Growing biotech organizations often rely on spreadsheets, email, shared repositories, and disconnected applications to coordinate regulated R&D work. As programs expand, these tools can make ownership unclear, separate decisions from supporting evidence, and limit operational visibility.

Educational presentation 14 slides Surai Technologies LLC

THE OPERATING PATTERN

Local tools create friction between workflows

Spreadsheets, email, repositories, and specialized applications can each work well for an individual purpose. Difficulty develops where work crosses their boundaries.

Status may differ across trackers. Decisions may remain inside email threads. Evidence may sit apart from the record it supports. Teams then spend more time reconciling, copying, reminding, and reconstructing context.

Regulated R&D work connected to spreadsheets, email, shared repositories, and point systems
The coordination burden appears between otherwise useful tools.

WORKFLOW DIAGNOSIS

Five questions reveal where coordination breaks down

Apply these questions to one cross-functional workflow before defining technology requirements.

  1. 01

    Trigger

    What event starts the work, and does the organization recognize it consistently?

  2. 02

    Owner

    Who remains accountable for moving the work forward and closing it?

  3. 03

    Information

    What records, evidence, and context does the team need?

  4. 04

    Decision

    Where does the team capture decisions, rationale, and approvals?

  5. 05

    Follow-up

    How does the organization make actions, exceptions, and overdue work visible?

OPERATING MODEL

Connected work aligns five elements

Improvement requires a shared operational context across people, process, information, technology, and oversight. Optimizing only one element moves the friction elsewhere.

Connected R&D work framework linking people, process, information, technology, and oversight
Governed AI assistance paired with permissions, context, human review, and traceability

GOVERNED AI

AI can assist while people retain authority

AI can help users find and summarize information, prepare draft content, identify missing information, and suggest next steps with supporting rationale.

Permissions, relevant workflow context, human review, and traceability should govern that assistance. People remain responsible for evaluating proposals and authorizing controlled actions.

A 90-DAY STARTING POINT

Begin with one meaningful workflow

Days 1–30

Assess

Map the trigger, stages, owners, information, decisions, and pain points.

Days 31–60

Design

Define the future process, oversight needs, success measures, and pilot scope.

Days 61–90

Pilot and learn

Adapt the enabling tools, run the pilot, collect evidence, and refine the model.

CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION

Discuss your R&D operating challenges

Explore where clearer processes, connected information, and practical technology decisions could reduce manual coordination.

Start a conversation Explore the R&D Operations Diagnostic View all insights